Catalyst: DC pensions
DC PENSIONS TECHNICAL UPDATE | WINTER EDITION
Notes from our editor
The defining theme of this edition of Catalyst is preparation – and the widening gap between those who are ready for change and those who aren't.
For their part, regulators are putting the work in to raise standards across the board, all in the name of helping regular people prepare for retirement – both The Department for Work and Pensions and The Pension Regulator have shown they are actively working to help trustees, employers and sponsors deliver better outcomes for their pension scheme members through enhanced governance, compliance, training and accreditation.
But will this all be enough to address pension inequality? Take the new regulations on Guided Retirement Duty for example – The Pension Regulator's own survey reveals that whilst master trusts and larger schemes are well aware of their duties, smaller schemes are lagging behind, with many even reporting to be completely unaware of their duties.
As we begin 2026, the message is clear: readiness matters. Those schemes working with the regulators and investing in governance, data quality, and member-focused design will thrive in this new landscape. Those standing still risk being left behind.
At a glance
- The Department for Work and Pensions has launched a consultation with the intention of strengthening governance and trustee standards across trust-based pension schemes, expected to conclude in March 2026.
- The landscape altering Pension Schemes Bill 2025 (“the Bill”) has returned to the House of Commons for its report stage and third reading, with several amendments made following another round of consultation.
- A survey from The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has highlighted many small DC scheme trustees are unaware of upcoming Guided Retirement Duty responsibilities.
- TPR has further outlined their plans to modernise, raising the bar for governance and transparency across pension schemes.
- Finally, TPR has also published revised member data quality guidance following its market oversight report on data quality.
- At the end of 2025, HM Treasury published the Consultation Response to the Financial Conduct Authority's 'Targeted Support' framework.
- December also saw the close of the Department for Work and Pensions’ consultation on Retirement Collective Defined Contribution (R-CDC) schemes - a development that could reshape the way we think about retirement income for DC savers.
- The Money and Pensions Service (MaPS) has published its latest research as part of Talk Money Week, an annual campaign designed “to encourage people to #StartTheConversation about money and pensions”.
DWP consultation on trustee governance
In December, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) launched a consultation with the intention of strengthening governance and trustee standards across trust-based pension schemes. The consultation runs until 6 March 2026 and could lead to changes for schemes, trustees, and sponsors alike.
What’s the consultation about?
The proposals focus on improving trustee capability and governance. This includes introducing mandatory training and possible accreditation for trustees, enhancing diversity and independence on boards, and creating a trustee register to give regulators better oversight.
Independent trustees are also under the spotlight, with suggestions for stricter compliance, limits on the number of appointments, and clearer conflict-of-interest rules. Administration standards may become mandatory or subject to direct regulation.
For larger, consolidated schemes, the consultation considers how governance structures can remain independent and free from conflicts as scale increases.
What are the implications?
These potential changes aim to build confidence in trustee decision-making and scheme governance. Trustee boards may need to meet new accreditation requirements and adjust board composition. Independent trustee firms could face tighter rules, and sponsors should anticipate changes to governance and administration arrangements.
How we can help
Understanding the potential impact of these proposals is key to staying ahead of regulatory change.
We can help you:
- Assess to what extent the consultation may affect your scheme and governance arrangements
- Identify areas where early planning could reduce future disruption
- Support you in preparing and submitting a response to the consultation to help influence the outcome
Pension Schemes Bill amendments
On 3 December 2025, the Pension Schemes Bill 2025 (“the Bill”) returned to the House of Commons for its report stage and third reading. Amendments were voted on and some were incorporated into the Bill, including the following:
- Bringing forward the commencement date of the provisions addressing the Virgin Media case to the date of Royal Assent (expected mid-2026), instead of two months after Royal Assent. Additional details within the provisions were clarified to ensure legal certainty for affected schemes.
- Abolishing the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) administration levy, which is expected to be implemented with effect from the latter of 1 April 2026 and the date of Royal Assent. The PPF Board’s costs and Ombudsman’s expenses will now be funded through the general levy on occupational pension schemes;
- Introducing inflation protection for pre-1997 pensions in the PPF and Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS, as announced in the Autumn Budget 2025.
- Introducing procurement exemptions for LGPS asset pool management.
The Pensions Minister also announced, during the third reading, that the Government intends to develop statutory guidance explaining what trustees of private, trust-based pension schemes must do to meet their fiduciary duties. The Government aims to provide more details on this over the next few months.
The announcement made in the 2025 Budget, that surplus payments to members over pension age may be permitted from April 2027, will require further legislation and is therefore not yet included in the Bill.
The Bill passed the House of Commons and was sent to be considered by the House of Lords, of which the second reading took place on the 18 December 2025. This involved general debate, but no further amendments have been announced. The Bill will now be scrutinised by the Committee in detail, which is scheduled to begin on 12 January 2026.
Majority of small and micro schemes unaware of Guided Retirement Duty
The Pensions Regulator (TPR) conducts an annual survey on defined contribution trust-based pension schemes to understand how they are managed and identify areas for improvement. The latest survey, published in October 2025, was carried out by OMB Research and focused on the following key areas: value for members, governance, administration, transfers to master trusts, scams, and importantly, guided retirement/decumulation.
The Guided Retirement Duty is a new UK pension regulation (under the Pension Schemes Bill 2025) requiring DC pension trustees to design and offer clear, pre-packaged retirement income solutions, including "default pension benefit solutions", to help members near retirement make choices without needing to become financial experts. Implementation of this duty is expected in 2027.
The survey shows many smaller DC schemes are slow in preparing for the duty. As might be expected, awareness varies greatly by size, with larger schemes (master trusts, and large and medium own trusts) already providing significant retirement support, whereas many small/micro schemes offer little beyond statutory comms.
Worryingly, the survey determined that awareness of the proposed duty was very poor amongst small and micro schemes. 87% of micro schemes (12 members) and 53% small schemes (12-99 members) were not aware of the duty. This fed through to a question asking if Schemes had considered moving to a master trust, which could help with this specifically and other duties. Only 12% of small and 4% of micro schemes had looked at this option or would be considering a move to master trust in future. In contrast, every master trust was aware of the proposed duty, as were over three-quarters (77%) of large and 76% of medium schemes.
These findings add further impetus to the move toward fewer, larger, better-governed schemes, with master trusts playing a central role. Smaller schemes face increasing pressure to improve in a number of areas, with guided retirement yet another area for them to comply with.
Action for trustees:
- Review and assess any existing decumulation options
- Based on that review develop default retirement income pathways to guide members into suitable decumulation options
Action for employers:
- Liaise with your pension provider or advisers to understand what decumulation options are available.
How we can help:
We can help Trustees review their options and ensure they have a suitable default pension benefit solutions in place for their members.
Driving better outcomes: What TPR’s modernisation means for you
In November 2025, Nausicaa Delfas, Chief Executive of TPR, set out a bold vision for a modern, proactive regulatory system that puts savers at the heart of decision-making. This wasn’t a compliance update, but rather a fundamental shift in expectations for trustees, sponsors, and providers alike.
Key takeaways from TPR’s speech
- Outcomes over box-ticking: Governance will continue to evolve to focus on whether savers achieve good retirement outcomes. Expect sharper scrutiny of investment strategies, risk management, and member communications.
- Value for money as a core metric: Schemes must evidence that members are getting real value, not just meeting minimum standards. This aligns with the government’s wider push on value-for-money frameworks for DC pensions.
- Data and digital first: Modernisation means greater use of data analytics and digital tools for real-time risk monitoring. Schemes should assess data quality and readiness for digital reporting now.
- Proactive intervention and collaboration: The regulator wants to act earlier to prevent harm, not just respond after issues arise. Expect closer collaboration between TPR, trustees, advisers, and providers to raise standards.
- Innovation and risk management: With new products, consolidation, and technology reshaping pensions, TPR expects robust governance frameworks to manage emerging risks.
- Member-centric communications: Clear, timely, and engaging communication is no longer optional. TPR sees this as critical to building trust and helping members make informed decisions.
Modernisation will raise the bar for governance and transparency. Schemes that embrace digital, strengthen risk frameworks, and prioritise member outcomes will be well-placed in this new environment.
How we can help:
Barnett Waddingham can support with:
- Governance reviews and readiness assessments
- Digital and data strategy for pensions
- Member engagement and communication planning
TPR says member data is a strategic asset
On 18 November 2025, TPR published revised member data quality guidance following its market oversight report on data quality.
The report emphasises that a core responsibility for trustees is to make sure data quality is well managed and it goes on to say that member data should be treated as a strategic asset rather than an operational detail or just to meet regulatory compliance. Excellent data quality helps to ensure efficient scheme management, informed decision-making, and accurate benefit delivery.
TPR acknowledges that significant progress has been made to improve data quality in preparation for pensions dashboards but some schemes still have more to do to get their member data in shape.
Julian Lyne, TPR’s Executive Director of Market Oversight, said: “Good data is the foundation of good governance and a trustee’s most important strategic asset. Trustees are accountable for ensuring member data is correct – no-one else. Maintaining its quality is an ongoing responsibility, because neglect can be costly and have real-world consequences for savers.”
Actions for trustees:
- Assess both common data (personal identifiers) and scheme-specific data (benefit details).
- Assess data quality at least annually (or more often for large/complex schemes).
- Use clear scoring methodology for completeness and accuracy.
- Create formal, time-bound plans with clear responsibilities and resources.
- Embed data quality in risk management and board oversight, avoiding overreliance on administrators.
Targeted Support
On 30 June 2025, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published a consultation on its proposed regulatory framework for targeted support.
Targeted support is a new regulatory category designed to sit between generic guidance and full regulated financial advice. Its purpose is to help more people make better pension decisions at scale, without needing a full, personalised advice process.
The consultation closed on 29 August 2025, with 13 responses received from financial services firms, trade bodies and consumer groups. On 11 December 2025, HM Treasury (HMT) published the Consultation Response to the Targeted Support framework.
The response outlined:
- details that legislative changes will be introduced via a statutory instrument, with the FCA’s authorisation gateway scheduled to open in March 2026 giving firms time to prepare (the framework is then expected to launch in April 2026); and
- that targeted support will improve consumer outcomes by offering practical, tailored guidance, while maintaining robust protections.
On the same day, the FCA published their Policy Statement regarding targeted support, setting out near-final rules for the new regulatory framework, including:
- Firms must have a clear processes with strict definitions for consumer situations or segments (e.g. age or savings level) to prevent overly individualised profiling.
- Firms should use ready-made suggestions and actions for consumers.
- Support will need to be Consumer Duty compliant, with clear disclosures clarifying that it is not individual advice.
- Firms will need FCA approval to provide targeted support, which will be managed via a gateway.
- Firms should communicate to consumers outlining what targeted support is, its limits, and why the consumer falls into a certain situation or segment.
- Firms are now able to issue whole-of-market annuity brokerage directions without requiring a break before annuity sales.
- Support must be managed in line with joint guidance from the Financial Ombudsman Service and Information Commissioner's Office on complaint handling and marketing compliance. Complaints will still be handled under existing FCA rules.
Retirement CDC: Consultation
Early December saw the close of the Department for Work and Pensions’ consultation on Retirement Collective Defined Contribution (R-CDC) schemes - a development that could reshape the way we think about retirement income for DC savers.
At Barnett Waddingham, we welcome the ambition behind this consultation: to broaden the range of options available to retirees. Our response was deliberately constructive, recognising the potential benefits of collective risk-sharing while sounding a note of caution. R-CDC could offer a compelling alternative for those seeking predictable income without the cost of guarantees. But innovation in pensions is never without complexity. If introduced too quickly or without the right safeguards, R-CDC risks unintended consequences that could undermine confidence in the wider system.
Key themes from our response
- Cautious Support for Innovation: Extending access to CDC is a positive step - but it should complement, not replace, ongoing improvements to DC retirement solutions.
- Investment Strategy Challenges: R-CDC is not whole-life CDC. With no regular contributions and a pensioner-only membership, investment strategies must:
- Focus on stable, inflation-aware income
- Manage liquidity and sequencing risk
- Build resilience for market stress. Robust stress testing will be essential.
- Scale and Sustainability: Early scale matters. Without it, schemes risk poor performance and loss of trust. Government may need to consider mechanisms - such as guided retirement defaults - to accelerate growth, while ensuring this does not disadvantage DC members.
- Member Protection and Complexity: Transfers without consent raise concerns. Safeguards should include:
- clear, early communications; and
- standardised disclosures on benefit variability and charges.
- Design Simplicity Over Complexity: While cohorting aims to address fairness, we believe a single-pool model with transparent annual adjustments offers a simpler, more sustainable solution.
Looking ahead
R-CDC has potential - but success depends on clarity, governance, and member understanding. This is not just about creating a new product; it’s about building trust in a new way of delivering retirement income.
We will continue to engage with policymakers and industry stakeholders to ensure this potential next chapter delivers better outcomes for savers.
How we can help:
Please contact your Barnett Waddingham consultant if you would like to:
- Arrange a training session on how CDC schemes work in practice and how they differ from DB and DC
- Explore whether R-CDC could be an option for your scheme
- Receive a copy of our full consultation response
The Money and Pension Service MoneyView 2025
It is widely recognised that poor financial wellbeing significantly impacts the workplace through reduced productivity, increased absenteeism, and higher staff turnover. Employees struggling with money worries often experience heightened stress and anxiety, which directly affects their work performance and overall engagement.
On 5 November 2025, the Money and Pensions Service (MaPS) published its latest research as part of Talk Money Week, an annual campaign designed “to encourage people to #StartTheConversation about money and pensions”.
MoneyView2025 is the latest large-scale survey about the financial wellbeing of UK adults aged 18-65. In total, 12,534 people were interviewed between July and October 2024.
Key findings at a glance
Financial resilience:
- 52% struggle to keep up, are falling behind, or have fallen behind with paying their bills
- 19% regularly use credit, overdrafts, or borrow for essentials
- 53% couldn’t manage three months’ expenses without borrowing
- 26% couldn’t afford a £300 unexpected bill
Retirement:
- 53% don’t feel they understand pensions well enough for retirement decisions
- 50% have no plan for future finances
Savings:
- 46% do not save regularly
Financial education and digital inclusion:
- 52% of all adults are not confident making decisions about financial products and services
- 18% of all adults do not use internet / mobile banking
Action for employers:
To support employees consider implementing a financial wellbeing strategy, which could include:
- Providing financial education and guidance workshops and webinars
- Introducing workplace savings schemes (e.g. workplace ISA)
- Partnering with debt advice organisations
Salary sacrifice primary legislation
From 6 April 2029 the Government proposes that employer and employee NICs would be due on pension contributions above £2,000 a year made through salary sacrifice. Pension contributions over this level will be subject to Class 1 primary and secondary Employee / Employer National Insurance contributions.
Legislation to effect the change will be introduced in two stages:
- Primary legislation: The National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill is now at House of Commons Committee Stage. Salary sacrifice contributions to registered pension schemes will no longer be NI exempt under the Optional Remuneration Arrangements (OpRA), subject to a defined limit (£2,000 for 2029/30).
- Secondary legislation: This will focus on the design and operation of the £2,000 contribution limit, following stakeholder engagement.
In 2024, it is estimated £32bn of pensions contributions used salary sacrifice pension arrangements, with the value of contributions predominantly from higher and additional rate taxpayers.
As the new rules won’t come into force until April 2029 employers offering salary sacrifice for pension contributions don’t need to make immediate payroll or communication changes.
Action for employers
For those currently using salary sacrifice:
- Review the potential future cost to their business and employees, and plan how to manage it, especially if employer NIC savings are shared with employees.
- Where not already utilised consider introducing bonus exchange, although this will need careful planning and clear employee communication ahead of April 2029.
For those not currently using salary sacrifice:
- Consider introducing salary sacrifice for ongoing employee contributions and bonus exchange, although this will need careful planning and clear employee communication ahead of April 2029.
How we can help
- Contribution modelling to demonstrate the savings that could be achieved through salary/bonus sacrifice
- Communications support on the implementation of a new scheme and the on the forthcoming changes.
Quick updates
- Individuals who are members of a Defined Benefit (DB) scheme may be pleased to hear that a review of the £30,000 cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) limit, imposed on transfers to DC arrangements, is being undertaken. This followed a 2023 review of the regulations and concerns around the cost and availability of financial advice, given the limit was introduced more than ten years ago alongside “pension freedoms”.
Active consultations affecting DC pensions
Trust-based pension schemes: Consultation aimed at trustees focussing on improving standards of pension scheme trusteeship, governance and administration. This consultation has proposals on increasing knowledge and understanding requirements with centrally set standards and accreditation for professionals and measures to improve the diversity of trust boards. The closing date for this consultation is 6 March 2026.
Extending the collective defined contribution (CDC) code of practice consultation: Consultation aimed at amending the existing CDC code which applies to single and connected employer CDC schemes (‘single-employer CDC schemes’) so that it will cover the authorisation and supervision of unconnected multiple employer schemes providing CDC benefits (‘multi-employer CDC schemes’). The closing date for this consultation is 13 February 2026.
The Value for Money Framework: Response to consultation, further consultation and discussion paper - Consultation aimed at refining the FCA’s Value for Money Framework on how workplace pension arrangements are assessed. It proposes streamlined metrics, a market comparator group, and a four point rating system to help identify top performing schemes. The closing date for this consultation is 8 March 2026.
Forthcoming events:
- Webinar: Britain’s Got Talent: understand people risks and improve retention – Thursday 26 February
- Training: DB trustee online training sessions – Tuesday 24 - Thursday 26 February
- Training: DC pensions training – Wednesday 4 - Thursday 5 March