I agree We use cookies on this website to help us provide the best user experience. By browsing this site you agree to their use - more information is available here.

Barnett Waddingham
0333 11 11 222
We recognise that technical asset risk is a major concern. What is the real geological structure in the subsurface? How producible are the hydrocarbons? How reliable is a production forecast? How reliable is a company’s internal validation process? It may be difficult to be sure of the quality of information available.

Technical risk associated with a particular asset, project, or proposal for financing is often harder to assess, or more uncertain, than the traditional financial risks.

To give confidence, from a financial profession perspective, we can provide an in-depth statistical review and validation of the accuracy of such as:

  • production forecasts
  • reportable quantities such as HCIIP
  • reserves classified by PRMS categories

Working with professionals such as geophysicists, reservoir engineers and petroleum economists, we can undertake thorough, technically competent review of technical asset risk.

Supporting your due diligence process, we can apply actuarial valuation and pricing techniques to give you a fully integrated view of risk, including:

  • non-transferrable, inherent risks such as subsurface risk
  • inherent risks transferrable through hedging or insurance arrangements
  • external risks such as commodity pricing, or fiscal regime change
  • traditional financial risks
  • assessment of the impact on corporate valuation and capital management
  • assessment of the quality of existing risk management processes

We can also support review of high value proposals such as a Field Development Plan, applying our Validation Framework of questions developed in partnership with industry experts.

Related knowledge and resources


  • Picture for Perspectives on estimation and modelling for large engineering projects
    Perspectives on estimation and modelling for large engineering projects

    In a recent survey of over 160 Upstream 'megaprojects', with an average project size of $6.6 billion, EY identified 65% of projects as experiencing cost over-runs, and 78% experienced delays. We look at the inherent uncertainty with large CAPEX projects.

  • Picture for Maximising economic recovery from a chilly North Sea
    Maximising economic recovery from a chilly North Sea

    Is Competition law having a chilling effect on the Oil and Gas Authority’s (OGA) call to 'Maximise Economic Recovery' from the UK North Sea? The UK’s new OGA has a primary responsibility to implement the recommendations of a report by Sir Ian Wood.

  • Picture for Is there a new paradigm for oil pricing?
    Is there a new paradigm for oil pricing?

    The New York Times published an article on 22nd April, headed ‘New Balance of Power’, claiming that ‘the United States’ is overtaking OPEC as the ‘vital global swing producer that determines prices’. Read more in our latest blog.

  • New services for Oil and Gas exploration companies

    Ground-breaking new services will use the principles of actuarial science that are a key part of our existing insurance and pensions business, and apply them to the modelling and analysis undertaken by companies in the oil and gas exploration industry.

Updates delivered to you

Stay ahead with our latest comment, expert insight and event details.