At Barnett Waddingham we provide a totally independent employer advice service. Our aim is to empower scheme sponsors in their negotiations with trustees, thereby allowing them to regain some control. This can range from simply explaining the funding process and trustee issues to the sponsor, to structuring bespoke financial solutions to deal with specific needs.
In any event, the solution should take account of the commercial reality of the negotiation whilst allowing trustees to carry out their responsibilities at the same time.
The Triennial funding valuation is also a good opportunity for the sponsor to think more widely about its ultimate aim for the pension scheme. We work with sponsors to help them formulate their ideas in this area, for example:
Our work involved providing support to a multinational company which acquired a UK operation with a large (>£3bn) DB scheme several years ago through a historic transaction.
We provided support to the company in its negotiations
with the trustees during the triennial valuation process.
This involved keeping the management team, based in Europe, up to date with developments in UK pensions, analysing and challenging assumptions and figures prepared by the scheme actuary, exploring alternative scenarios with the company and preparing a counter-proposal and support during meetings with a trustee sub-committee.
As part of the analysis we were able to demonstrate that, under the trustees’ proposed funding plan, the scheme could potentially be fully funded on a buy-out basis ahead of the end of the proposed recovery period. As part of the counter-proposal to the trustees we helped develop a framework which could be used to manage the funding level of the scheme towards a buy-out position over a longer time horizon. One of the conclusions reached was that it would be more efficient to target a buy-out once the majority of deferred members have retired, to avoid having to purchase deferred annuities which tend to be much more expensive compared to immediate annuities.
We also worked closely with our investment team, who are also advising the company, in developing the counter-proposal. They used cashflows provided by the scheme actuary to prepare an analysis of the progression of the funding level over time which the company was able to use as part of the counter-proposal. The investment team also carried out an analysis for the company to give them a better understanding of the interest rate, inflation and credit risks inherent in the trustees’ investment strategy which highlighted potential areas where further de-risking could be considered.
The negotiations were challenging as our analysis provided good evidence for the company to pay reduced contributions. The strategy adopted by the scheme had served it well over the three years to the valuation date and the position had improved. The trustees were reluctant to accept a reduction to the current level of contributions and the matter was further complicated because the scheme actuary has a role in setting the contribution rate.
The end result was that although the company was unable to secure an extension to the recovery period it was able to negotiate down the deficit and secure a significant reduction in total contributions. The company was also able to secure a cap on future contribution requirements should the deficit increase at the next valuation (which is effectively an undertaking to extend the recovery period in the event of adverse experience).Find out more
Did you know that one of the most significant trends emerging for employers who sponsor a DB pension scheme, was the rise in transfer values paid out to scheme members who have yet to draw their pension?
Our latest blog discusses and comments on defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution (DC) transfer values, including analysis of ACA survey results.
Regulated apportionment arrangements are becoming more common as stressed employers look to cut ties with their pension scheme. We look at the settlement agreed with the Pensions Regulator for Hoover Limited.
This note sets out some of the technical issues relevant to those involved in the preparation and the audit of pension disclosures.
Quarter 4 of 2015 saw a very strong finish to the year for the UK bulk annuity market. Overall, the value of business in 2015 fell just short of the record set in 2014, but was considerably above previous years.
The Budget 2016 did not see the sweeping changes to pension tax allowances and reliefs that many had predicted, but the introduction of a new Lifetime ISA as well as the consolidation of the financial advisory services prompted a flurry of debate.
Now two years into freedom and choice in DC retirement savings, for members of a DB scheme making the most of these flexibilities will involve transferring to a DC arrangement. We provide an update on the lay of the land.
This survey looks at 15 Scandinavian companies, with around £6.1bn of UK pension liabilities between them, almost all of which are constituents of the OMX Share Index that have UK subsidiary companies with DB pension schemes.
Then focus of the survey was the transition from Dun & Bradstreet to a bespoke insolvency risk model with Experian. The survey also considered areas such as the change to the contingent asset certification process, mortgage exclusions and LMS schemes.