Barnett Waddingham : Independent Actuaries and Consultants
Skip to page content
Search
Home
|
About Us
Our People
Our Values
Forthcoming Events
Corporate Social Investment
|
Services
Trustee Consulting
Pension Administration
Investment Consulting
Corporate Consulting
Employee Benefits
Auto-Enrolment
Public Sector Consulting
Insurance Consulting
Private Clients
Longevity Consulting
Small Schemes (SIPP and SSAS)
Executive Pensions
|
Careers
Actuarial Graduate Recruitment
Actuarial
Pension Administration
Small Schemes
Regulated Advice
IT
Latest Vacancies
|
News
|
Literature
Commentaries
Newsletters
Information on Our Services
Archive
Annual Review
|
Glossary
|
BWebstream
|
Contact Us
Amersham
Bromsgrove
Cheltenham
Glasgow
Leeds
Liverpool
London
Request Information
RSS Feeds
Recent News
Archive
2012
2011
2010
-
December 2010
-
November 2010
-
October 2010
-
September 2010
-
August 2010
-
July 2010
-
June 2010
-
May 2010
-
April 2010
-
March 2010
-
February 2010
-
January 2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
Home
>
News
>
2010
>
March 2010
>
Budget 2010 - Pensions Tax Relief
Budget 2010 - Pensions Tax Relief
Commenting on the Treasury’s proposal to implement the restriction of pensions tax relief, Barnett Waddingham partner
Andrew Roberts
said:
“There is a risk here that without due care and attention, the Treasury will damage the further reputation of the pensions industry. The consultation process that ended earlier this month clearly revealed those who objected to the proposals were doing so because of practical, administrative issues and worries about how the changes will be implemented. Instead of sweeping these objections under the carpet and hoping the whole process doesn’t have to be started from scratch, the Treasury needs to be taking decisive action.
“As an example, the Treasury has dismissed widespread calls for the Annual Allowance to be reduced (say from £255,000 to £60,000) as a simpler way of restricting tax relief, claiming that such a change could not be implemented fairly without making ‘significant adjustments to the pensions tax system that would add their own complexity’. But, as the tax system being rushed through is arguably the most complex aspect of the pension taxation system ever seen, to simply reject industry wide proposals for a simpler alternative with the argument that they would be more complex is wrong.
"
The “scheme pays” system was widely rejected by the industry as being unnecessary and unworkable, particularly within DB schemes, but yet it again features in the proposals. You have to wonder whether the only justification for pressing ahead with the “scheme pays” legislation is to save face on the work done in drafting it.”
If you would like more details please contact our
Marketing team